Code of Ethics Comparison

comparing of moral philosophy Codes Church center or Self Focused Diana Calhoun Liberty University consider The Ameri suffer standstill of deliverymanian Counselors (AACC) and the Ameri burn down appearance connection (ACA) have both established a code of ethics to do and protect their members in serving and protecting their leaf nodes. While thither be legion(predicate) differences surrounded by the deuce ethics codes, there atomic number 18 in any case m all homogeneousities. The first bulge out of this essay pull up stakes discuss the general differences in ethics codes adhered to from the AACC and the ACA.The second part of this essay pass on discuss the differences between the twain organizations codes of ethics in cognitive contents of conflict of interest in fees, sexual intimacies, and discrimination. In conclusion clarification on how the similarities between the both codes argon the AACCs attempt to non put unrivalled over beas in which the ACAs practice is non glorifying to savior and how His church should respond in such subject matters. Comparison of Ethics Codes Church Focused or Self FocusedThe ultimate finis between the American Association of delivery boyian Counselors (AACC) and the American Counseling Association (ACA) is different in their code of ethics interest. In the ACA Code of Ethics the main terminal of the companionships members atomic number 18 to recognize renewal, and embrace a cross-cultural approach in support of the regard as dignity, potential and uniqueness of people within their neighborly and cultural contexts (2005, p. 3).The AACC Code of Ethics primary goal is to bring purity to Jesus deliveryman and his church, incite excellence in Christian direction, and bring oneness to Christian exponents (2004, p. 3). Even though these goals be vastly different, in order for the AACC to accomplish its goal of honour Christ and the church it excessively wants to lovingly regard Gods c reation while pleader people. With that in mind the AACC Code of Ethics consulted the American Counseling Association in addendum to another(prenominal) ethics codes in the drafting of its statement (2004, p. ). This creates many similarities and differences between the two codes. The similarities are revealed as the AACC carry honourable stances from the ACA that supported the AACCs goal, not match it. The practices on how these two different goals are achieved by both organizations pull up stakes be reexamineed a longsighted with its affects on ethical views. contribution I General Comparison of the Two Codes two the AACC and ACA have a similar general goal to do no detriment to the customer, and that all their actions should be consistent with that focusing goal. there are many sub goals and protocols to assist the counselling in abiding to this steering goal. Sub goals consist of regards to privacy, allow for counselor- customer relationship guidelines, way plan s, training and resolutions of ethical issues. until now the difference between the AACC and ACA is the sight or translation of what each group considers being no handicap to the client. The ACA code of ethics appears to be legal guidelines in counseling clients to learn to look inward and annoy decisions in life on their own base on the clients moral value.This can include to any degree the clients view on sex, drugs, money, power or any pleasure deriving device to provide the client with immediate satisfaction. As stated in adequate Christian Counseling this however can be a numbing agent providing rook line succor when one desires to find purpose for their life. This short endpoint relief can lead to long term sorrow. Being entrapped in long term sorrow is not classified as a no defame counseling goal for any client (Clinton, & Ohlschlager, 2002, p. 26).The AACC Code of Ethics goes beyond exclusively legal guidelines in their dedication to Jesus Christ as their first love, to excellence in client service, to ethical integrity in practice, and to respect for everyone encountered (2004, p. 5). check to Competent Christian Counseling, Christian counselors not tho want to help foster growth for a healthy lifestyle but excessively to assist clients in a more fulfilling life that leave sustain, to show clients relief that lasts, purpose that remains, and direction that leads to a hope-filled future.The sufferers who flee into the arms of God can look this relief (Clinton, & Ohlschlager, 2002, p. 26). This is ultimately the no harm perspective and goal long term no harm and not just short term relief no harm. The AACC Code of Ethics also strives that til now in having this ultimate goal they also honor the clients choice in spiritual interventions in counseling, verifying that the clients goals are the counselors goals and that the counselor is respecting the clients counseling goals (2004, p. 11, 1-330).This balance is shown by the counselor not condoning abortions, adultery, abuse, addictions, and divorce yet the counselor testament not steal against a client whose touchs and value are not the same. The Christian counselor is spurred on to use the counseling sessions as Jesus did when he ate and fellowshipped with sinners (Matthew 910 NLT). The only coincidence with the ACA Code of Ethics is the stance to avoid enforce values that are inconsistent with counseling goals. (2002, p. 4, A. 4) Section II circumstantial Comparison of Three ill-tempered AreasFees Fees for services rendered should be clearly stated to the client. Both code of ethics for the ACA and the AACC contain guidelines for possible picks for how fees can be rendered. The profound difference between the two is the lack of provision by the ACA for when funds are not sufficient from the client to cover the cost. In their code of ethics, the ACA (2002) fastens an optional provision through bartering in character A. 10. d as an only election before r eferring clients to affordable comparable services as stated in section A. 10. c (p. 6).In addition to bartering, in their code of ethics, the AACC (2004) goes on to encourage a sliding fee scale or even pro bono work as stated in sections 1-513 and 1-512 in order to meet the client where they are financially (p. 13). These solutions can be temporary or permanent for the clients financial situation. These are additional ways that the AACC suggest for ethical compensation. They are also great ways to go beyond the basic legal criteria as stated in the ACA code of ethics in order to make assistance available for clients to obtain counseling.These techniques are also supportive of the counselors goal of not abandoning the client. Sexual Intimacies Sexual intimacies are the application of pre-marital or extramarital sexual behavior in a clients life. Both the AACC and the ACA share the ethical guideline of not elevated the counselors values and beliefs on the client. However the AACC a nd the ACAs similarities snag at that point. In their code of ethics the ACA (2002) states in section A. 4 that counselors are to avoid imposing their own values and are to respect the diversity of their clients (p. -5). The AACC (2004) states in their code of ethics in section 1-125 that counselors leave alone refuse to condone or suggest the pursuit or active involvement in sexual behavior outside of marriage (p. 7). There is a clear distinction between the two ethical codes on this matter. Christian counselors leave not abandon a client by subtile against a client even when the clients beliefs and values are different. A counselor is not to impose their own beliefs and values on a client but the counselor can review a clients motives that may terminate their actions.Discrimination Discrimination is when roughlyone is accomplished differently from others, receivable to involvement in a certain group. Specific groups receiving differential treatment can be set by age, ge nder, race, ethnicity, socio-economic status, education, sexual orientation, sexual behavior, denomination, belief system, values, or political affiliation. Both the ACA Code of Ethics and the AACC Codes of Ethics contain guidelines for on discrimination, and neither will brave out discrimination.In their code of ethics the ACA (2002) states that counselors do not discriminate in a manner that has a detrimental impact on a person (p. 10, C. 5). In the AACC Codes of Ethics states that not only would they not treat persons in a harmful manner, but that they will challenge harmful attitudes and actions while express a loving care and ultimately loving one well when pushing them forward (2004, P. 6, 1-101). These harmful attitudes and actions will not uprise discriminatory topics of sexual behavior, belief systems, values or others but will be lovingly examined to what may fuel the actions in these areas.Conclusion The distinctions between the two ethical codes from the AACC and the ACA do not exclude the Christian counselor from treating clients with situations that differ from the counselors own(prenominal) values. Since Christian counselors are not to condone and advocate actions that do not bring honor to Jesus Christ and his church, they are challenged with fitting their counseling models to people, rather than fitting people to counseling models as stated by Clinton & Ohlschlager in their book, Competent Christian Counseling (2002, p. 6). These counseling models may include some unique methods such as a willingness to demo people with an attitude of love and to challenge them to mend erroneous beliefs about the world. Research has shown these techniques to be more or less beneficial and potent (Clinton & Ohlschager, 2002, p. 43). These techniques can lead a client to a more fulfilling life that will sustain, as the Christian counselor honors Jesus Christ by handling his creation, the client, in the best way possible.Excluding Christian counselors from working with clients whose lifestyles are different from the counselors personal values, gives the client the only option to find counselors that hold the same personal values and belief perspectives as the client. Counseling for the client will then be focused on themselves and the pursuit of their happiness. The AACC encourages Christian counselors not to let financial, personal value differences, or discrimination to interfere the main goal of the Christian counselor to honor Jesus Christ and the church in the pursuit of the gospel bode through counseling.The ACA encourages the counselor to keep all personal values out of the counseling environment in order to push the client forward in their own personal pursuit of happiness as long as it is legal and supportive of their counseling goals. This illustrates differences in church and self focused ethics. References American Counseling Association. (2005). ACA Code of Ethics. Retrieved from http//www. counseling. org/resources/cod eofethics/TP/home/ct2. aspx. American Association of Christian Counselors. (2004). AACC Code of Ethics. Retrieved from http//www. aacc. net/about-us/code-of-ethics/.Clinton, T. & Ohlschlager, G. (2002). Christian counseling and grieve soul care The case for twenty-first-century practice. In T. Clinton & G. Ohlschlager (Eds. ). Competent Christian counseling Foundations and practice of compassionate soul care. (pp. 11-34), Colorado Springs, CO Waterbrook Press. Clinton, T. & Ohlschlager, G. (2002). Competent Christian counseling Definitions and dynamics. In T. Clinton & G. Ohlschlager (Eds. ). Competent Christian counseling Foundations and practice of compassionate soul care. (pp. 36-68), Colorado Springs, CO Waterbrook Press.